Downloads: 58
Neha Jain
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 322 - 328
Downloads: 45
Alka Jain
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 329 - 343
Downloads: 46
Zhiwei Chen & Sanjeev Sonawane
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 344 - 351
Downloads: 45
Zhiwei Chen & Sanjeev Sonawane
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 352 - 359
Downloads: 43
Anoop Kumar Singh & Rupesh Kumar Gupta
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 360 - 369
Downloads: 47
Vini Sebastian
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 370 - 374
Downloads: 49
Sachin Sadashiv Surve & Dhananjay Bagul
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 375 - 399
Downloads: 43
Sanjay Kumar Singh & J.K.Singh
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 400 - 407
Downloads: 48
M.Vijayakumar
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 408 - 419
Downloads: 46
Anamika
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 420 - 431
Downloads: 51
Rege K & Aranjo. P
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 432 - 445
Downloads: 51
Ajay Kumar Chaudhary & Bharat Dadhich
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 446 - 457
Downloads: 43
Seema Sharma
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 458 - 464
Downloads: 63
Shouvik Roy
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 465 - 470
Downloads: 47
Hariom Verma
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 471 - 476
Downloads: 45
Sudhir Pandurang More
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 477 - 490
Downloads: 49
Pandey Gayatri & Pandey vivek
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 491 - 498
Downloads: 106
Minakshi Biswal
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 499 - 507
Downloads: 74
Rohit Berwal
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 508 - 524
Downloads: 63
Jaya Virat
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 878 - 885
Downloads: 75
SANDHYA PATEL
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 525 - 531
Downloads: 50
Leelavatti
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 532 - 536
Downloads: 51
Ambica Saini
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 537 - 542
Downloads: 39
Mrs. Manjuri Gogoi & Sailendra Bhuyan
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 542 - 562
Downloads: 974
Mr. Vijay M.Gawas & Mr.Mahesh Velip
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 563 - 579
Downloads: 73
Sudhindra Roy & Ritendra Roy
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 580 - 591
Downloads: 53
Jagan Karade
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 592 - 606
Downloads: 48
Sangeeta N. Pawar
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 607 - 618
Downloads: 44
Subir Sen & Tuhin Kumar Samanta
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 619 - 629
Downloads: 48
N.V.Bose
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 630 - 651
Downloads: 71
Sumana Paul
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 652 - 661
Downloads: 168
Raghuveer Pinisetty
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 662 - 670
Downloads: 41
Veena A. Prakashe & Sapana S. Tayade
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 671 - 679
Downloads: 42
Ms. Anupama
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 680 - 686
Downloads: 42
C .A. Shingte
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 687 - 692
Downloads: 32
Veena Devi Trivedi
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 693 - 697
Downloads: 30
Kishor Keshaorao Wikhe
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 698 - 706
Downloads: 33
Chaudhari Manoj A.
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 707 - 712
Sujay Madhukar Khadilkar
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 698 - 714
Downloads: 40
Kapil Gandhar
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 715 - 735
Downloads: 57
Dalveer Singh Kaunteya
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 736 - 744
Downloads: 38
Sawinder Arora
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 745 - 749
Downloads: 55
Uttam N. Gadhe
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 750 - 757
Downloads: 56
Dipak Chavan
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 758 - 763
Downloads: 48
Prof. Rajendra Thigale
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 764 - 772
Downloads: 54
Patil Anil Nimba
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 773 - 783
Downloads: 44
Surendra Singh
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 784 - 797
Downloads: 46
Radhakrishnan T.T.
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 798 - 815
Downloads: 46
Khushal Limbraj Mundhe
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 816 - 818
Dr. H N VISHWANATH
Received Date: 10/07/2015 | Accepted Date: 20/08/2015 | Published Date: 04/09/2015
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 819 - 827
Effective Teaching and meaningful Learning in Science are the two foci of imparting productive Science education. If both are to be highly qualitative, it’s very important for the teachers and practitioners to realize and refine their understandings of curriculum transaction in Science. It is an accepted fact that effective teachers are usually not born but made through training, exposure and experience. Good Science teachers nurture their scientific knowledge and skills through constant and deliberate efforts. One of the prerequisite to be a good science teacher is to understand the process of teaching-learning science and effective classroom management in more depth.
It is indeed a sorry state of affairs that even today teaching is just transacting curriculum by way of direct explanation of the content for conceptual understanding by teachers where students are just passive recipients of information rather active producers of new knowledge. In the context of NCF 2005 and NCFTE 2009, which strongly advocate self-construction of knowledge, it is very significant to rethink about the dynamics of curricular transaction and redesign the pedagogic dimensions in the teaching of Science so as to enable students construct their own scientific knowledge, relate it to the immediate environment, reflect it in their personality and extend the same for problem solving in life and community for a better quality of life. More specifically learning of Science needs to be shifted from passive and conventional methods to active and innovative methods.
In this context one has to seriously think about how to make children active learners with an enhanced ability to construct their own scientific knowledge and become productive citizens of our country. There is an element of discovery, exploration, and inquiry in every child that probably lead him or her to a contributory individual in terms of scientist. In a nutshell each individual student is a budding scientist who is only to be pulled out. This would be possible only when teachers modify their information transferring conventional classrooms into a place where students are transformed to produce new knowledge, get their scientific skills sharpened, scientific attitude is promoted, aptitude is magnified and in total the competence levels of students are boosted up. This indeed requires a new pedagogy called Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers shall try to refine and reflect their understandings of the principles of constructivism and put conscious efforts to design a Constructivist Learning Environment (CLE) their Constructivist Classrooms.
In this context the present study finds its significance, as the researcher tries to analyze the teaching-learning process and the pedagogical dynamics of constructivist science curricular transaction when students are employing 5E model of teaching Science.
Downloads: 115
Dr. H N VISHWANATH
Received Date: 10/07/2015 | Accepted Date: 20/08/2015 | Published Date: 04/09/2015
Issue: Jul-Aug, 2015 | Volume/Issue:3/19 | Page No.: 819 - 827
Effective Teaching and meaningful Learning in Science are the two foci of imparting productive Science education. If both are to be highly qualitative, it’s very important for the teachers and practitioners to realize and refine their understandings of curriculum transaction in Science. It is an accepted fact that effective teachers are usually not born but made through training, exposure and experience. Good Science teachers nurture their scientific knowledge and skills through constant and deliberate efforts. One of the prerequisite to be a good science teacher is to understand the process of teaching-learning science and effective classroom management in more depth.
It is indeed a sorry state of affairs that even today teaching is just transacting curriculum by way of direct explanation of the content for conceptual understanding by teachers where students are just passive recipients of information rather active producers of new knowledge. In the context of NCF 2005 and NCFTE 2009, which strongly advocate self-construction of knowledge, it is very significant to rethink about the dynamics of curricular transaction and redesign the pedagogic dimensions in the teaching of Science so as to enable students construct their own scientific knowledge, relate it to the immediate environment, reflect it in their personality and extend the same for problem solving in life and community for a better quality of life. More specifically learning of Science needs to be shifted from passive and conventional methods to active and innovative methods.
In this context one has to seriously think about how to make children active learners with an enhanced ability to construct their own scientific knowledge and become productive citizens of our country. There is an element of discovery, exploration, and inquiry in every child that probably lead him or her to a contributory individual in terms of scientist. In a nutshell each individual student is a budding scientist who is only to be pulled out. This would be possible only when teachers modify their information transferring conventional classrooms into a place where students are transformed to produce new knowledge, get their scientific skills sharpened, scientific attitude is promoted, aptitude is magnified and in total the competence levels of students are boosted up. This indeed requires a new pedagogy called Constructivist Pedagogy. Teachers shall try to refine and reflect their understandings of the principles of constructivism and put conscious efforts to design a Constructivist Learning Environment (CLE) their Constructivist Classrooms.
In this context the present study finds its significance, as the researcher tries to analyze the teaching-learning process and the pedagogical dynamics of constructivist science curricular transaction when students are employing 5E model of teaching Science.